Hemispheric dominance in contextual recognition is now under discussion. Auditory event-related potentials (ERPs) with a contextual decision task were recorded to study hemispheric dominance by using the wave energy and amplitudes of N400 for eight native volunteers. Two types of 80 sentences with four clauses were used as the structure: [subject] + [object or complement] + [object] + [two-syllable verb]. One type was congruent and the other deviated at the terminal clause as an incongruent sentence. Twenty-one channel ERPs were triggered at the verbs and recorded during -200 and 1,000 ms, with a noncephalic reference from 0.05 to 30 Hz. The wave energy was calculated as mean square potentials and was normalized with the background activity (pretrigger 200 ms). The amplitudes of N400 showed significant differences between the incongruent and congruent sentences, but the hemispheric dominance for the amplitudes of N400 was not significant between the incongruent and congruent sentences. Reaction times with the index finger to respond to the deviated verbs were 470.0 (mean) +/- 42.5 (SD) ms. The maximum normalized wave energy within the mean reaction time showed significant differences between the incongruent and congruent sentences, and the left hemispheric energy was shown to be significantly higher than the right one.