Impact of electronic imaging on clinician behavior in the urgent care setting

J Digit Imaging. 1999 May;12(2 Suppl 1):148-51. doi: 10.1007/BF03168785.

Abstract

Although it is intuitively valuable that more expedient delivery of radiographic images and reports to clinicians would improve patient care, it is important to document these outcomes to validate further advances in these areas. We evaluated the care of 215 patients seen at a walk-in clinic to determine what benefit digital imaging is to the patient. Cohorts consisted of all patients for whom specified radiology examinations were ordered during a 7-day period. The first cohort was recruited when analog films were used. The second cohort received examinations performed with computed radiography (CR) acquisition and computer display, which had been in use for 2 years. Patients were categorized as to the type of study they received, as well as whether a staff radiologist was immediately available to read the study. Clinical behavior was characterized by outcome measures of time to final diagnosis, time to final treatment, and need for follow-up. Our analysis demonstrated a reduction in time to final diagnosis that was better appreciated during the times when a staff radiologist was not immediately available. It also suggested that greater time reductions were seen for patients who received extremity examinations than those who received chest, sinus, or rib films. These data suggest that digital imaging is a useful tool to improve clinical outcome of patients seen in the acute care setting.

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Case-Control Studies
  • Cohort Studies
  • Data Display
  • Female
  • Follow-Up Studies
  • Hospitals, Group Practice
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Minnesota
  • Outcome Assessment, Health Care*
  • Outpatient Clinics, Hospital*
  • Patient Care
  • Radiology
  • Radiology Information Systems*
  • Referral and Consultation
  • Therapeutics
  • Time Factors
  • Tomography, X-Ray Computed*
  • X-Ray Intensifying Screens