Manual compared with mechanical cervical oesophagogastric anastomosis: a randomised trial

Eur J Surg. 1999 Nov;165(11):1051-4. doi: 10.1080/110241599750007883.

Abstract

Objective: To compare the short and medium term result of hand-sewn and stapled anastomoses after oesophagectomy.

Design: Randomised study.

Setting: Teaching hospital, Italy.

Subjects: 41 patients who required oesophagectomy between February 1993 and December 1996.

Interventions: Oesophagectomy and left cervical gastroplasty.

Main outcome measures: Mortality and morbidity.

Result: 21 patients were randomised to have the anastomosis hand-sewn, and 20 to have it stapled. The two groups were comparable. 3 patients died in hospital (2 in the hand-sewn and 1 in the stapled group), and the remainder were followed up a mean of 21 months (range 6-34). There was one clinical leak in the hand-sewn group compared with 3 in the stapled group, and 1 further radiological leak in the stapled group. 2 patients in the hand-sewn and 3 in the stapled group developed strictures.

Conclusion: Though the numbers are too small to be assessed statistically, we think that these result are sufficient to persuade us that oesophagogastric anastomoses should be hand-sewn rather than stapled.

Publication types

  • Clinical Trial
  • Comparative Study
  • Randomized Controlled Trial

MeSH terms

  • Anastomosis, Surgical / methods*
  • Carcinoma, Squamous Cell / surgery
  • Esophageal Neoplasms / surgery
  • Esophagectomy*
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Surgical Stapling*
  • Suture Techniques*