Limited resection for carcinoma of the upper thoracic oesophagus is not a realistic option

Eur J Surg Oncol. 2000 Sep;26(6):561-6. doi: 10.1053/ejso.2000.0947.

Abstract

Aims: Due to its anatomical position, carcinoma of the proximal oesophagus results in early invasion of adjoining structures, often precluding (radical) resection. We performed a retrospective study to compare the potentially curative and palliative treatment results in patients with proximal (i.e. at or above the carina) vs distal oesophageal carcinoma.

Methods: Over a 3-year period 30 patients with proximal and 145 patients with distal oesophageal cancer underwent surgery.

Results: Microscopically radical resection was achieved in 11/30 patients (43%) with a proximal tumour and in 96/145 patients (66%) with a distal tumour (P=0.007). Three-year survival was 13.8%vs 44.3% respectively; localization was an independent prognostic factor. Recurrent upper aero-digestive tract symptoms developed in 38% of the patients with a proximal tumour and in 19% of the patients with distal carcinoma (P<0.05).

Discussion: Carcinoma of the proximal oesophagus has a worse prognosis than more distal carcinomas. Definite cure is exceptional; many patients are ineffectively palliated. In patients with proximal oesophageal carcinoma surgery should not be performed outside clinical trials testing multimodality treatment.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Aged, 80 and over
  • Cardia / surgery
  • Esophageal Neoplasms / mortality
  • Esophageal Neoplasms / pathology
  • Esophageal Neoplasms / surgery*
  • Esophagus / anatomy & histology
  • Female
  • Follow-Up Studies
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Neoplasm Staging
  • Palliative Care
  • Proportional Hazards Models
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Stomach Neoplasms / mortality
  • Stomach Neoplasms / pathology
  • Stomach Neoplasms / surgery
  • Thorax