Routine cervical spine radiography for trauma victims: Does everybody need it?

J Trauma. 2001 Mar;50(3):529-34. doi: 10.1097/00005373-200103000-00019.

Abstract

Objective: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the indication for routine cervical spine radiography in trauma patients.

Methods: Prospective analysis of radiologic and clinical findings was performed during a 5-year period. Patients suitable for a clinical decision rule were reviewed separately.

Results: Of the 1,757 consecutive patients included in the study, 38 were diagnosed with a cervical spine injury. Of the 599 patients suitable for the clinical decision rule, 62 had midline cervical tenderness, including 2 with cervical spine injury. No additional cervical spine injuries were found during follow-up.

Conclusion: It is within good practice, and it is also cost-effective, to obtain a cervical spine radiograph only on clinical parameters in trauma patients with no apparent bodily trauma and optimal parameters. With this clinical decision rule, 30.6% of all cervical spine series were redundant, and no (occult) spinal fractures would have been undetected.

Publication types

  • Validation Study

MeSH terms

  • Adolescent
  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Aged, 80 and over
  • Cervical Vertebrae / diagnostic imaging*
  • Cervical Vertebrae / injuries*
  • Child
  • Child, Preschool
  • Clinical Protocols
  • Cost-Benefit Analysis
  • Decision Trees*
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Infant
  • Male
  • Mass Screening / economics
  • Mass Screening / standards*
  • Middle Aged
  • Multiple Trauma / diagnostic imaging*
  • Multiple Trauma / etiology
  • Needs Assessment
  • Patient Selection*
  • Practice Guidelines as Topic
  • Prospective Studies
  • Radiography
  • Risk Factors
  • Sensitivity and Specificity
  • Triage / standards
  • Wounds, Nonpenetrating / diagnostic imaging*
  • Wounds, Nonpenetrating / etiology