A comparison of the Ameroid constrictor versus ligation in the surgical management of single extrahepatic portosystemic shunts

J Am Anim Hosp Assoc. 2001 Jul-Aug;37(4):390-6. doi: 10.5326/15473317-37-4-390.

Abstract

Twenty-two dogs were managed surgically for a single extrahepatic portosystemic shunt; 12 with surgical ligation and 10 with an Ameroid constrictor. Utilization of the Ameroid constrictor significantly decreased surgery time to approximately half that of the ligation technique. A decreased intraoperative and postoperative complication rate was noted with the Ameroid constrictor group. Follow-up evaluation demonstrated comparable efficacy when comparing surgical techniques. The Ameroid constrictor offered a surgical occlusion technique for management of a single extra-hepatic portosystemic shunt that was equally effective to ligation while shortening surgical time and minimizing the risks that are commonly associated with ligation of the shunting vessel.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study

MeSH terms

  • Animals
  • Bile Acids and Salts / blood
  • Biocompatible Materials
  • Caseins
  • Constriction
  • Dog Diseases / congenital
  • Dog Diseases / epidemiology*
  • Dog Diseases / surgery*
  • Dogs
  • Female
  • Florida / epidemiology
  • Hydrogels
  • Hypertension, Portal / epidemiology
  • Hypertension, Portal / surgery
  • Hypertension, Portal / veterinary*
  • Incidence
  • Ligation / veterinary
  • Male
  • Portal Vein / abnormalities*
  • Portal Vein / surgery*
  • Records / veterinary
  • Retrospective Studies

Substances

  • Bile Acids and Salts
  • Biocompatible Materials
  • Caseins
  • Hydrogels
  • ameroid