Hydroxyapatite-coated versus grit-blasted femoral stems. a prospective, randomised study using EBRA-FCA

J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2001 Sep;83(7):979-87. doi: 10.1302/0301-620x.83b7.11478.

Abstract

We have carried out a prospective, randomised study designed to compare the long-term stability of the stem of cementless femoral implants with differing surface configurations. A total of 50 hips (46 patients) was randomised into two groups, according to whether the medullary stem had been grit blasted (GB) or coated with hydroxyapatite (HA). Both femoral prostheses were of the same geometrical design. We used Ein Bild Roentgen Analyse femoral component analysis (EBRA-FCA) to assess the stability of the stem. The mean follow-up was for 8.66 years. The mean migration of the stem was 1.26 mm in the HA group compared with 2.57 mm in the GB group (Mann-Whitney U test, p = 0.04). A mixed model ANOVA showed that the development of subsidence was statistically different in the two groups during the first 24 months. After this subsidence increased in both groups with no difference between them. Our results indicate that, with the same design of stem, HA coating enhanced the stability of the femoral stem when compared with GB stems.

Publication types

  • Clinical Trial
  • Comparative Study
  • Randomized Controlled Trial

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Aged, 80 and over
  • Female
  • Femur Head* / diagnostic imaging
  • Follow-Up Studies
  • Hip Joint / diagnostic imaging
  • Hip Prosthesis* / adverse effects
  • Humans
  • Hydroxyapatites*
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Prospective Studies
  • Prosthesis Design
  • Prosthesis Failure
  • Radiography
  • Reoperation
  • Time Factors

Substances

  • Hydroxyapatites