Postlaryngectomy voice restoration using a voice prosthesis: a single institution's ten-year experience

Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2003 Dec;112(12):1007-10. doi: 10.1177/000348940311201202.

Abstract

We describe the speech rehabilitation outcome of patients treated with total laryngectomy or total laryngopharyngectomy and insertion of Provox voice prostheses (Atos Medical AB, Hörby, Sweden) at the Helsinki University Central Hospital. We performed a retrospective chart review of 95 patients (88 men and 7 women; mean age, 63.5 years) who underwent insertion of a voice prosthesis in the period 1992 to 2002. Eighty-one percent (77/95) of the patients underwent a primary prosthesis insertion at the time of laryngectomy. A head and neck surgeon, a laryngologist, and a speech therapist rated the long-term tracheoesophageal speech of 78% (74/95) of the patients as good or average. The main causes for replacement of the device were obstruction, leakage or inadequate size of the prosthesis, and granulation or leakage around the fistula. According to our 10-year experience, use of the Provox prosthesis is an effective method of postlaryngectomy voice rehabilitation, and it continues to be our preferred method of voice restoration in the majority of cases.

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Aged, 80 and over
  • Device Removal
  • Equipment Failure
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Laryngectomy / rehabilitation*
  • Larynx, Artificial*
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Pharyngectomy / rehabilitation
  • Retrospective Studies