Background: The current NIH and French consensus provide physicians with clear guidelines on how to care best for patients with hepatitis C.
Methods: Review and discussion.
Results: Confirming the diagnosis and guiding the initial investigations have become straightforward. The standard treatment and its monitoring have been described in many publications. Recommending therapy to patients with moderate fibrosis has been the custom since the 1999 EASL guidelines. The 2002 guidelines have widened the spectrum of patients with chronic hepatitis C that should be considered for antiviral therapy. Patient categories not previously considered for therapy, such as alcoholics, intravenous drug users, prison inmates and social subgroups of society that lack adequate medical care, can now be offered therapy provided they are well supported in specific programmes. Liver physicians have learned throughout the years to manage side effects successfully and encourage patient adherence. This is reflected in the higher sustained viral response rates with standard interferon and ribavirin reported in the pegylated interferon registration trials compared with the interferon-ribavirin trials. Reducing the dose rather than stopping therapy is the key issue. Antidepressive agents have their place in the management of mood disorders prior to or during therapy.
Conclusion: Every patient with chronic hepatitis C should be considered for antiviral therapy. It is probably best for a patient to be treated by a physician who has experience in managing possible side effects and in coaching a patient through his 6 or 12 months of treatment.