Contribution of stent underexpansion to recurrence after sirolimus-eluting stent implantation for in-stent restenosis

Circulation. 2004 Mar 9;109(9):1085-8. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000121327.67756.19. Epub 2004 Mar 1.

Abstract

Background: We used intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) to evaluate recurrence after sirolimus-eluting stent (SES) implantation treatment of in-stent restenosis (ISR).

Methods and results: Forty-eight ISR lesions (41 patients with objective evidence of ischemia) were treated with SES. Recurrent ISR was identified in 11 lesions (all focal); repeat revascularization was performed in 10. These were compared with 16 patients (19 lesions) without recurrence as documented by angiography. Nine of 11 recurrent lesions had a minimum stent area (MSA) <5.0 mm2 versus 5 of 19 nonrecurrent lesions (P=0.003); 7 of 11 recurrent lesions had an MSA <4.0 mm2 versus 4 of 19 nonrecurrent lesions (P=0.02); and 4 of 11 recurrent lesions had an MSA <3.0 mm2 versus 1 of 19 nonrecurrent lesions (P=0.03). A gap between SESs was identified in 3 of 11 recurrences versus 1 of 19 nonrecurrent lesions.

Conclusions: Stent underexpansion is a significant cause of failure after SES implantation treatment of ISR.

Publication types

  • Clinical Trial
  • Comparative Study

MeSH terms

  • Combined Modality Therapy
  • Coronary Angiography
  • Coronary Restenosis / diagnosis
  • Coronary Restenosis / diagnostic imaging
  • Coronary Restenosis / therapy*
  • Drug Delivery Systems*
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Sirolimus / administration & dosage*
  • Sirolimus / therapeutic use
  • Stents*
  • Treatment Failure
  • Ultrasonography

Substances

  • Sirolimus