Phase III results with a totally implantable piezoelectric middle ear implant: speech audiometry, spatial hearing and psychosocial adjustment

Acta Otolaryngol. 2004 Mar;124(2):155-64. doi: 10.1080/00016480310016055.

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the treatment efficacy of an electromechanical middle ear amplifier implant (AI) in patients with chronic moderate-to-severe sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL). The AI is a piezoelectric system with a sound processor and a rechargeable battery within a hermetically sealed titanium canister. Its titanium-sealed microphone is placed in the bony region of the ear canal. The incus-coupled transducer (actuator), which is also inside a titanium casing, is fastened to the adjacent bone.

Material and methods: This was a phase III study comprising 20 intention-to-treat patients. Telemetrical adjustments followed electromechanical amplifier implantations. We used a word recognition test as our primary efficacy measure (Freiburg Speech Recognition Test: DIN 45621). Secondary efficacy measures were the sentence comprehension test (Goettinger Satztest, 1996) for auditory orientation within noisy and quiet environments and a psychosocial adjustment test (Gothenburg Profile Test, 1998). The 6-month follow-up comprised a complete medical examination. Nineteen patients completed the study (per-protocol patients; 100% reference).

Results: Seventeen patients (89%) demonstrated improved binaural recognition of phonetically balanced monosyllables. Fourteen postoperative patients (74%) attained a perfect score (100%) on this test, compared to only 3 preoperative patients (16%). Thirteen patients (68%) reached the sentence recognition threshold at a 2:1 dB signal-to-noise ratio during noisy trials. Correct identification of the noise source direction in the horizontal plane occurred in 89% of the trials. The Gothenburg Profile Test scores showed that the subjective evaluation of hearing, orientation, social behavior and self-confidence increased from 48% to 88%. Three patients did not benefit from the implant.

Conclusion: Treatment of SNHL with a totally implantable hearing system can be an efficient method for those patients unable to wear hearing aids. However, in order to avoid implantation in non-responders, there is a need for more specific audiological indication criteria.

Publication types

  • Clinical Trial
  • Clinical Trial, Phase III

MeSH terms

  • Audiometry, Pure-Tone
  • Audiometry, Speech
  • Auditory Threshold*
  • Evaluation Studies as Topic
  • Female
  • Hearing Loss, Bilateral / therapy*
  • Hearing Loss, Sensorineural / therapy*
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Ossicular Prosthesis*
  • Patient Selection
  • Prospective Studies
  • Prosthesis Design
  • Social Adjustment*
  • Speech Perception*
  • Treatment Outcome