Infection control in intensive care units: U.K. national survey

Br J Anaesth. 1992 Feb;68(2):216-20. doi: 10.1093/bja/68.2.216.

Abstract

A completed questionnaire was returned by 246 (85%) intensive care units participating in a national survey of infection control practice in intensive care. Thirty-three units had no provision for isolating patients in single side wards. Sixty percent of responding ICU had fewer than one washbasin per bedspace. Several units reported using ventilator filters or tubing more frequently than is currently recommended. Excessive numbers of catheter urine specimens were sent for laboratory examination by some units. A small number of units used open urinary drainage systems. A significant proportion of ICU had no formally recognized policy on the management of intravascular cannulae. Only 8% of ICU in the U.K. were using a selective decontamination regimen, and nine of these (50%) had no full time consultant microbiologist available to supervise the recommended microbiological management. The majority of ICU received a regular visit (greater than or equal to one per week) from a microbiologist. Proposals are made on the development of a specialized infection control service in order to reduce the risk of nosocomial infection in intensive care, and to improve on existing resource management.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Bacterial Infections / prevention & control
  • Cross Infection / prevention & control
  • Humans
  • Infection Control / methods*
  • Intensive Care Units* / organization & administration
  • Intensive Care Units* / standards
  • United Kingdom