The outcome of referral with postcoital bleeding (PCB)

J Obstet Gynaecol. 2005 Apr;25(3):279-82. doi: 10.1080/01443610500107221.

Abstract

We reviewed 284 women with postcoital bleeding (PCB) seen in colposcopy and gynaecology clinics over eight years. 166 women were referred with PCB alone (group 1) and 118 with PCB and abnormal cervical cytology (group 2). The aim was to assess the validity of the Department of Health (DoH) referral guidelines for suspected cancer in women with PCB, to measure the frequency of abnormal findings in these women, and to review the management of PCB with the aim of identifying and addressing deficiencies. No pathology was identified in half of women in group one and in 17% of group two. The rate of cervical cancer was 3.6% in group one and 5% in group two. The equivalent figures for CIN were 9% and 66.1% respectively. There was no significant difference in the prevalence of cervical cancer or CIN between women >?35 years and the rest of women in group one. The management of PCB was inconsistent. Neither age nor duration of PCB was a reliable indicator for cervical cancer. A normal smear record must not be regarded as reassuring in a woman with PCB.

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Coitus*
  • Female
  • Hemorrhage / etiology*
  • Hemorrhage / therapy*
  • Humans
  • Middle Aged
  • Referral and Consultation*
  • Reproducibility of Results
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Treatment Outcome
  • Uterine Cervical Diseases / complications
  • Uterine Cervical Diseases / diagnosis