To evaluate and compare the safety and efficacy of catheter-mediated direct-current and radiofrequency ablation in patients with Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome, 114 patients with accessory pathway-mediated tachyarrhythmias underwent catheter ablation. Electrophysiologic parameters were similar in patients undergoing direct-current (group 1, 52 patients with 53 accessory pathways) and radiofrequency (group 2, 62 patients with 75 accessory pathways) ablation. Immediately after ablation, 50 of 53 accessory pathways (94%) were ablated successfully with direct current, but 2 of the 50 accessory pathways had early return of conduction and required a second ablation; 72 of 75 accessory pathways (96%) were ablated successfully with radiofrequency current. In the three accessory pathways in which radiofrequency ablation was unsuccessful, a later direct-current ablation was successful. During follow-up (group 1, 14 to 27 months; group 2, 8 to 13 months), none of the patients with successful ablation had a recurrence of tachycardia. Complications in direct-current ablation included transient hypotension (two patients), accidental atrioventricular block (one patient), and pulmonary air trapping (two patients); complications in radiofrequency ablation included cardiac tamponade (one patient) and suspicious aortic dissection (one patient). Myocardial injury and proarrhythmic effects were more severe in direct-current ablation. The length of the procedure and the radiation exposure time were significantly shorter in direct-current (3.5 +/- 0.2 hours, 30 +/- 4 minutes) than in radiofrequency (4.1 +/- 0.4 hours, 46 +/- 9 minutes) ablation. Findings in this study confirm the impression that radiofrequency ablation is associated with fewer complications than direct-current ablation and radiofrequency ablation with a large-tipped electrode catheter is an effective and relatively safe nonsurgical method for treatment of Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome.