Hand-assisted laparoscopy versus conventional median laparotomy for aortobifemoral bypass for severe aorto-iliac occlusive disease: a prospective randomised study

Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2006 Dec;32(6):645-50. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2006.06.003. Epub 2006 Jul 24.

Abstract

Objectives: To demonstrate that hand-assisted laparoscopy for aortofemoral bypass for severe aorto-iliac occlusive disease reduces morbidity with earlier recovery of bowel function and shorter in-hospital stay.

Design: Randomised controlled trial.

Materials and methods: Thirty-six consecutive patients with severe aorto-iliac occlusive disease (TASK C/D) without history of major abdominal surgery necessitating an aortobifemoral bypass were randomised between a hand-assisted laparoscopic (HALS) approach and a conventional medial laparotomy. Operative data, early recovery data, quality of life and vascular outcome were analysed.

Results: No significant differences in operative data were found. Fluid and solid diet were resumed earlier (28.8 hrs vs. 76.9 hrs; p = 0.016) (45.6 hrs vs. 105.6 hrs; p = 0.02) and in-hospital stay was shorter (7.5 vs. 8.9 days; p = 0.005) in the HALS group. Six weeks post-operatively social functioning measured by the SF-36 survey score was better in patients randomised to HALS (p=0.023).

Conclusions: HALS is a less invasive approach for aortofemoral bypass.

Publication types

  • Randomized Controlled Trial

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Aortic Valve Stenosis / surgery*
  • Arterial Occlusive Diseases / surgery*
  • Blood Loss, Surgical
  • Body Temperature
  • Female
  • Follow-Up Studies
  • Humans
  • Iliac Artery / surgery*
  • Laparoscopy* / adverse effects
  • Laparoscopy* / methods
  • Laparotomy
  • Length of Stay
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Prospective Studies
  • Quality of Life
  • Research Design
  • Severity of Illness Index
  • Time Factors
  • Treatment Outcome
  • Vascular Patency
  • Vascular Surgical Procedures* / adverse effects
  • Vascular Surgical Procedures* / methods