Biomechanical comparison of C1-C2 posterior arthrodesis techniques

Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2007 Jun 1;32(13):E363-70. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e318060cc65.

Abstract

Study design: Biomechanical comparison of 5 atlantoaxial posterior arthrodesis techniques.

Objective: To assess the relative value of different posterior wire constructs when one or two transarticular screws are used.

Summary of background data: A combination of Gallie or Brooks techniques and 2 posterior transarticular screws has been shown to be effective for atlantoaxial arthrodesis. Anatomic constraints may preclude the insertion of a transarticular screw unilaterally or bilaterally.

Methods: Ten adult human cadaveric upper cervical spine specimens were used. The specimens were tested intact, after odontoidectomy and transverse and capsular ligament section and after stabilization with each of the 5 techniques: Brooks-Jenkins cable fixation, Brooks-Jenkins with unilateral transarticular screw, Gallie posterior wire construct with unilateral transarticular screw, Brooks-Jenkins with bilateral screws, and Gallie with bilateral screws. Pure moments were applied in flexion-extension, lateral bending, and torsion within physiologic limits (<1.5 Nm).

Results: In flexion-extension and lateral bending, the range of motion (ROM) and neutral zone (NZ) increased significantly after the specimens were injured as compared with intact spines (P < 0.001). After stabilization, the ROM and NZ were significantly lower than in injured and intact spines in all motions (P < 0.01) except lateral bending in the intact spine. Among the 5 instrumented techniques, the ROM for the Gallie construct with 1 screw was significantly higher than for the Brooks-Jenkins construct with 1 or 2 screws in flexion-extension (P < 0.05). In axial torsion, the Gallie construct with 1 screw displayed a larger NZ and ROM than any of the other 4 constructs (P < 0.05).

Conclusions: Gallie or Brooks-Jenkins cable fixation alone may not be adequate for atlantoaxial arthrodesis. If 2 supplemented transarticular screws can beinserted, there is no difference between the Gallie or Brooks techniques. If only a single screw can be inserted, the Brooks-Jenkins technique is recommended rather than a Gallie technique.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study
  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Aged
  • Aged, 80 and over
  • Axis, Cervical Vertebra / physiology
  • Axis, Cervical Vertebra / surgery*
  • Bone Screws
  • Cadaver
  • Cervical Atlas / physiology
  • Cervical Atlas / surgery*
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Range of Motion, Articular
  • Spinal Fusion / instrumentation
  • Spinal Fusion / methods*
  • Torsion Abnormality
  • Weight-Bearing