Perceived weight versus Body Mass Index among urban Aboriginal Australians: do perceptions and measurements match?

Aust N Z J Public Health. 2008 Apr;32(2):135-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1753-6405.2008.00189.x.

Abstract

Objective: To examine the relationship between perceived body weight and measured Body Mass Index (BMI) among urban Aboriginal Australian adults.

Methods: We compared responses to a question on perceived weight with BMI based on measured health and weight among 248 Aboriginal volunteers aged>or=15 years who took part in a larger health study in the Darwin area between September 2003 and March 2004. Logistic regression was used to examine associations between socio-economic, demographic and cultural factors and under-assessment of weight.

Results: Being male and having diabetes were significantly associated with under-assessment of weight. Despite under-assessment being common, most participants with a BMI>or=25--and almost all (>90%) those with BMI>or=25 plus high waist circumference--described themselves as overweight.

Conclusions: Study participants with BMI>or=25 were generally able to classify themselves appropriately as overweight.

Implications: Lack of awareness of weight is unlikely to represent a major barrier to engaging Aboriginal people. However, other barriers exist, and both individual-level and environmental/structural approaches are required to reduce the burden of obesity among Aboriginal Australians.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study
  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Adolescent
  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Aged, 80 and over
  • Australia
  • Awareness
  • Body Image*
  • Body Mass Index*
  • Body Weight*
  • Female
  • Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice*
  • Humans
  • Logistic Models
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Risk
  • Social Perception*
  • Surveys and Questionnaires
  • Urban Population*