Background: Glomerular filtration rate (GFR) is the best measure of kidney function; however, 24-hour creatinine clearance (CrCl) is the initial screening test used for lung transplant candidates at most centers. Although creatinine-based formulas that estimate GFR have been derived, none have been validated in patients with severe lung disease.
Methods: We performed a retrospective cohort study of patients evaluated for lung transplantation at Columbia Presbyterian Medical Center and compared the GFR estimated from the Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) and other formulas to the CrCl. We then validated these results in a cohort of patients evaluated at the Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania.
Results: There were strong and statistically significant direct correlations between estimated GFR and CrCl. An estimated GFR of <95 ml/min by the MDRD was very sensitive at detecting kidney dysfunction by CrCl in the derivation cohort. In the validation cohort, the negative predictive value of this cut-off was 97%.
Conclusions: Established formulas for estimating GFR are highly discriminating for kidney dysfunction in patients being evaluated for lung transplantation and may actually have greater validity than CrCl in some instances.