Interobserver variability affects investigations involving assessment of complex visual data, such as histopathology, radiology and motility. This study assessed interobserver variation for interpretation of antroduodenal manometry (ADM), as this has not been previously investigated. Thirty-five ADM recordings from children aged 0.3-18 years were independently evaluated by five experienced paediatric gastroenterologists who were blinded to cases' clinical histories. Intra-class correlation (ICC) was analysed for detection and measurement of phase three of the migrating motor complex (MMC) and Cohen's kappa statistic was calculated between observer pairs for detection of specific motility features and final diagnosis. Observers were unanimous on the differentiation of normal and abnormal motility in 63% of cases. There was excellent interobserver agreement for the number of phase three of the MMC in fasting (ICC = 0.82, P < 0.0001) and for measurements of phase three of the MMC (ICC = 0.9999, P < 0.0001). Detection of other normal and abnormal motility patterns varied more. Objective findings such as the presence of phase three of the MMC correlated more closely than findings that involved the integration of several variables, such as final diagnosis. However, these data overall indicate that agreement between expert observers for the distinction of normal and abnormal antroduodenal motility compares favourably with other standard medical assessments.