Shifting clinical accountability and the pursuit of quality: aligning clinical and administrative approaches

Healthc Manage Forum. 2008 Autumn;21(3):6-19. doi: 10.1016/S0840-4704(10)60269-4.
[Article in English, French]

Abstract

This paper presents a narrative review of the literature on clinical accountability, and draws particularly on England's experience establishing "clinical governance" as a base to examine the establishment of a clinical accountability framework for cancer services in Ontario. The review suggests that clinical governance and accountability approaches that actively mesh clinical and administrative approaches at both system and local levels are more likely to be effective in improving quality of care.

Publication types

  • Review

MeSH terms

  • Cancer Care Facilities / standards
  • Clinical Governance*
  • Humans
  • Leadership*
  • Medical Oncology / standards*
  • Models, Organizational
  • National Health Programs / standards*
  • Ontario
  • Quality Assurance, Health Care / organization & administration*
  • Social Responsibility*
  • State Medicine / standards*
  • United Kingdom