Abstract
This paper employs a nationally representative, household-based dataset in order to test how the compensation method of both the specialists and the primary care providers affects surgery rates. After controlling for adverse selection, I find that when specialists are paid through a fee-for-system scheme rather than on a capitation basis, surgery rates increase 78%. The impact of primary care physician compensation on surgery rates depends on whether or not referral restrictions are present.
MeSH terms
-
Adult
-
Capitation Fee*
-
Decision Making
-
Elective Surgical Procedures / economics
-
Elective Surgical Procedures / statistics & numerical data
-
Fee-for-Service Plans / economics*
-
Fee-for-Service Plans / statistics & numerical data
-
Female
-
Health Care Surveys
-
Humans
-
Insurance, Health / classification
-
Insurance, Health / economics
-
Male
-
Patient Selection
-
Physician Incentive Plans / economics*
-
Physician Incentive Plans / statistics & numerical data
-
Physicians, Family / economics
-
Physicians, Family / statistics & numerical data
-
Practice Patterns, Physicians' / economics*
-
Practice Patterns, Physicians' / statistics & numerical data
-
Referral and Consultation / economics
-
Referral and Consultation / statistics & numerical data
-
Specialties, Surgical / economics
-
Specialties, Surgical / statistics & numerical data
-
Surgical Procedures, Operative / economics*
-
Surgical Procedures, Operative / statistics & numerical data