A survey of ampullectomy practices

World J Gastroenterol. 2009 Jul 28;15(28):3486-92. doi: 10.3748/wjg.15.3486.

Abstract

Aim: To investigate the endoscopic ampullectomy practices of expert biliary endoscopists.

Methods: An anonymous survey was mailed to 79 expert biliary endoscopists to assess ampullectomy practices.

Results: Forty six (58%) biliary endoscopists returned the questionnaire. Of these, 63% were in academia and in practice for an average of 16.4 years (+/- 8.6). Endoscopists performed an average of 1.1 (+/- 0.8) ampullectomies per month. Prior to ampullectomy, endoscopic ultrasound was "always" utilized by 67% of respondents vs "sometimes" in 31% of respondents. Empiric biliary sphincterotomy was not utilized uniformly, only 26% "always" and 37% "sometimes" performed it prior to resection. Fifty three percent reported "never" performing empiric pancreatic sphincterotomy prior to ampullectomy. Practitioners with high endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography volumes were the most likely to perform a pancreatic sphincterotomy (OR = 10.9; P = 0.09). Participants overwhelmingly favored "always" placing a prophylactic pancreatic stent, with 86% placing it after ampullectomy rather than prior to resection (23%). Argon plasma coagulation was the favored adjunct modality (83%) for removal of residual adenomatous tissue. Practitioners uniformly (100%) preferred follow-up examination to be within 6 mo post-ampullectomy.

Conclusion: Among biliary experts, there is less variation in ampullectomy practices than is reflected in the literature.

MeSH terms

  • Ampulla of Vater / surgery*
  • Cholangiopancreatography, Endoscopic Retrograde*
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Pancreatic Neoplasms / surgery
  • Practice Patterns, Physicians'*
  • Stents
  • Surveys and Questionnaires
  • Treatment Outcome