[EIA-IgG antibody measles prevention level estimated from measles neutralizing, particle agglutination and hemagglutination-inhibition antibody titer]

Kansenshogaku Zasshi. 2009 Sep;83(5):519-24. doi: 10.11150/kansenshogakuzasshi.83.519.
[Article in Japanese]

Abstract

Measles hemagglutination inhibition (HI) antibody titer, widely used in clinical practice to simply and easily determine the measles immunity level has, in recent years, been increasingly replaced by measles IgG-antibody titer determined by enzyme-immunoassay (EIA). HI antibody titer appears to reflect this protective level, because HI measures the antibody against H protein required for the measles virus to adhere to host cells. EIA-IgG antibody titer does not correlate with the protective level, similar to particle agglutination (PA) titer, because EIA measures different antibodies, including those unrelated to measles protection. After determining HI, PA, neutralizing test (NT) results, and EIA-IgG antibody titer for individual specimens, we compared EIA-IgG antibody titer obtained using an EIA-Kit (Denka Seiken) to HI, PA, and NT titer with the following results: (1) Subjects with EIA-IgG titer of > or = 12.0 may be protected against measles: (2) Subjects with EIA-IgG titer of 4.0 to 8.0 appear to be protected insufficiently requiring a booster dose against measles: (3) Subjects with EIA-IgG titer of 8.0 to 12.0 may benefit from booster vaccination.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study
  • English Abstract

MeSH terms

  • Antibodies, Viral / blood*
  • Child, Preschool
  • Hemagglutination Inhibition Tests
  • Humans
  • Immunoenzyme Techniques
  • Measles / prevention & control*
  • Measles virus / immunology*

Substances

  • Antibodies, Viral