Comparison of immunoperoxidase and immunofluorescence assays for pp65 cytomegalovirus antigen in immunocompromised patients

Braz J Infect Dis. 2009 Apr;13(2):142-6. doi: 10.1590/s1413-86702009000200014.

Abstract

We compared the pp65 antigen detection by an in house method (immunoperoxidase assay) and by a commercial kit (immunofluorescence assay) available for cytomegalovirus infection diagnosis in immunocompromised patients. Sixty-four blood samples were analyzed in duplicate for both techniques. Eight-six percent of the samples had concordant qualitative results. The discordant results occurred more frequently in samples with low quantity of positive cells. There were no significant differences with qualitative and quantitative results of the methods.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Cytomegalovirus / immunology*
  • Cytomegalovirus / physiology
  • Cytomegalovirus Infections / diagnosis*
  • Female
  • Fluorescent Antibody Technique
  • Humans
  • Immunocompromised Host / immunology*
  • Immunoenzyme Techniques
  • Male
  • Phosphoproteins / analysis*
  • Pregnancy
  • Sensitivity and Specificity
  • Viral Matrix Proteins / analysis*
  • Virus Replication

Substances

  • Phosphoproteins
  • Viral Matrix Proteins
  • cytomegalovirus matrix protein 65kDa