Abstract
HIV-infected travellers frequently use atovaquone/proguanil as malaria prophylaxis. We compared atovaquone/proguanil pharmacokinetics between healthy volunteers and HIV-infected patients taking efavirenz, lopinavir/ritonavir or atazanavir/ritonavir. The geometric mean ratio (95% confidence interval) area under the curve (AUC)0-->t for atovaquone relative to the healthy volunteers was 0.25 (0.16-0.38), 0.26 (0.17-0.41) and 0.54 (0.35-0.83) for patients on efavirenz, lopinavir/ritonavir and atazanavir/ritonavir, respectively. Proguanil plasma concentrations were also significantly lower (38-43%). Physicians should be alert for atovaquone/proguanil prophylaxis failures in patients taking efavirenz, lopinavir/ritonavir or atazanavir/ritonavir.
Trial registration:
ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00421473.
MeSH terms
-
Adolescent
-
Adult
-
Aged
-
Alkynes
-
Atazanavir Sulfate
-
Atovaquone / blood*
-
Benzoxazines / administration & dosage
-
Benzoxazines / pharmacokinetics
-
Cyclopropanes
-
Drug Administration Schedule
-
Female
-
HIV Infections / drug therapy*
-
HIV Protease Inhibitors
-
HIV-1*
-
Humans
-
Lopinavir
-
Male
-
Middle Aged
-
Oligopeptides / administration & dosage
-
Oligopeptides / pharmacokinetics
-
Proguanil / blood*
-
Pyridines / administration & dosage
-
Pyridines / pharmacokinetics
-
Pyrimidinones / administration & dosage
-
Pyrimidinones / pharmacokinetics
-
Ritonavir / administration & dosage
-
Ritonavir / pharmacokinetics
-
Young Adult
Substances
-
Alkynes
-
Benzoxazines
-
Cyclopropanes
-
HIV Protease Inhibitors
-
Oligopeptides
-
Pyridines
-
Pyrimidinones
-
Lopinavir
-
Atazanavir Sulfate
-
efavirenz
-
Ritonavir
-
Proguanil
-
Atovaquone
Associated data
-
ClinicalTrials.gov/NCT00421473