Introduction: Fibrogenesis is a typical reaction of the liver to injury. In the case of overstimulation of fibrogenesis clinically significant fibrosis and, eventually, cirrhosis occur. Treatment of liver cirrhosis is limited, therefore it is important to screen and monitor patients at risk of cirrhosis. Noninvasive parameters are ideal for this purpose due to their risk profile and repeatability.
Methods: Systematic review of literature.
Results: Among large number of proposed biomarkers, there is a distinct difference between two groups or classes. Class I biomarkers are associated with the process of fibrogenesis, their presence in the serum is the result of the increased turnover of extracellular matrix. Class II biomarkers and their combinations are mostly markers of liver function or structural damage. We have identified 27 Class I and 13 Class II biomarkers that have been proposed in the literature. We have evaluated in detail those which reached limited clinical application.
Conclusion: General clinical acceptance of these biomarkers is low because of various drawbacks. Simple and readily available biomarkers have low accuracy in predicting liver fibrosis and more advanced markers have low cost-benefit ratio. Therefore liver biopsy remains the "gold standard" for diagnosis of fibrosis. However potential noninvasive alternatives exist and their implementation could be valuable.
Copyright 2010 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.