Where to position clozapine: re-examining the evidence

Can J Psychiatry. 2010 Oct;55(10):677-84. doi: 10.1177/070674371005501007.

Abstract

Objective: To review clozapine's position in treatment algorithms for schizophrenia.

Method: Clozapine's status is reviewed in the context of its initial discovery and unique clinical and (or) pharmacological profile, withdrawal and link with hematologic concerns, reintroduction with monitoring guidelines, prototype for atypicality, positioning in treatment algorithms, and current evidence regarding efficacy, effectiveness, and side effects.

Results: The hematologic monitoring implemented with clozapine's reintroduction here in North America has proven successful in preventing clozapine-related deaths secondary to agranulocytosis. While its other side effects are not without concern, present evidence does not link clozapine to increased mortality rates; indeed, it appears better than other antipsychotics in this regard. Moreover, its clinical superiority compared with all other antipsychotics has been confirmed both in efficacy and in effectiveness trials.

Conclusions: Schizophrenia continues to represent a treatment challenge, with many people demonstrating suboptimal response and poor functional outcome. Clozapine is routinely positioned as a third-line treatment in schizophrenia, but in light of existing evidence this warrants re-examination.

Publication types

  • Review

MeSH terms

  • Agranulocytosis / chemically induced
  • Agranulocytosis / diagnosis
  • Agranulocytosis / mortality
  • Antipsychotic Agents / administration & dosage
  • Antipsychotic Agents / adverse effects
  • Antipsychotic Agents / economics
  • Clozapine* / administration & dosage
  • Clozapine* / adverse effects
  • Clozapine* / economics
  • Cost-Benefit Analysis
  • Drug Monitoring / methods
  • Humans
  • North America
  • Schizophrenia / drug therapy*
  • Treatment Outcome

Substances

  • Antipsychotic Agents
  • Clozapine