Covered stents for coronary perforations: is there enough evidence?

Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2011 Aug 1;78(2):246-53. doi: 10.1002/ccd.23017. Epub 2011 Jul 15.

Abstract

Covered stents have shown discouraging results when tested on saphenous vein grafts and when attempting to prevent restenosis on native coronary arteries. However, covered stents seem to be a unique tool when a coronary artery perforation complicates percutaneous coronary intervention. Because a randomized clinical trial is not likely to be conducted in this bail-out scenario, the data supporting its use come from case reports and small-size retrospective studies. This review summarizes the available evidence supporting the use of covered stents to treat coronary perforations.

Publication types

  • Review

MeSH terms

  • Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary / adverse effects
  • Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary / instrumentation*
  • Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary / mortality
  • Coronary Vessels / injuries
  • Evidence-Based Medicine
  • Heart Injuries / etiology
  • Heart Injuries / mortality
  • Heart Injuries / therapy*
  • Hemostatic Techniques / adverse effects
  • Hemostatic Techniques / instrumentation*
  • Hemostatic Techniques / mortality
  • Humans
  • Prosthesis Design
  • Risk Assessment
  • Stents*
  • Treatment Outcome