Outcomes of patients with maxillofacial osteosarcoma: a review of 15 cases

J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2012 Mar;70(3):734-9. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2011.03.020. Epub 2011 Jul 20.

Abstract

Purpose: To assess clinical behavior, response to treatment, and factors affecting survival in maxillofacial osteosarcoma treated at a tertiary referral center.

Patients and methods: Ethics-approved retrospective review of clinical and pathological records was undertaken for 15 patients managed by the Royal Melbourne Hospital Head and Neck Oncology Tumor Stream.

Results: Treatment was a combination of surgery and chemotherapy. Chemotherapy was given as adjuvant, neoadjuvant, or in combination. The overall 2-, 5-, and 15-year disease-free survival rates in this study were 92%, 74%, and 74%, respectively. Using Kaplan-Meier analysis with log rank tests, increasing T stage (P = .01) and positive margins (P = .003) were found to affect survival significantly. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy was not significantly associated with tumor necrosis or improved survival.

Conclusions: Tumor size and adequacy of local control were found to be the most important predictors of outcome.

MeSH terms

  • Adult
  • Aged
  • Disease-Free Survival
  • Female
  • Head and Neck Neoplasms / drug therapy
  • Head and Neck Neoplasms / mortality
  • Head and Neck Neoplasms / surgery*
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Mandibular Neoplasms / drug therapy
  • Mandibular Neoplasms / mortality
  • Mandibular Neoplasms / surgery*
  • Maxillary Neoplasms / drug therapy
  • Maxillary Neoplasms / mortality
  • Maxillary Neoplasms / surgery*
  • Middle Aged
  • Osteosarcoma / drug therapy
  • Osteosarcoma / mortality
  • Osteosarcoma / surgery*
  • Outcome Assessment, Health Care
  • Proportional Hazards Models
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Young Adult