Is there a place for bone turnover markers in the assessment of osteoporosis and its treatment?

Rheum Dis Clin North Am. 2011 Aug;37(3):365-86, v-vi. doi: 10.1016/j.rdc.2011.07.002.

Abstract

As populations age, the number of osteoporotic fractures will increase. Bone mineral density (BMD) measurement remains the major way to diagnose osteoporosis and to indicate therapy. The FRAX tool, based on clinical risk factors, estimates the 10-year risk of hip and major osteoporotic fractures. The association of BMD and FRAX measurements has improved the identification of patients who are most at risk. However, some patients can still be overlooked and denied therapy. It is sound that adding the measure of bone turnover markers to the former risk factors and their follow-up during therapy could best address the efficacy of treatment of osteoporosis. Whether this behavior is cost-effective remains to be settled.

Publication types

  • Review

MeSH terms

  • Biomarkers / metabolism
  • Bone Density Conservation Agents / therapeutic use*
  • Bone Remodeling / drug effects
  • Bone Remodeling / physiology*
  • Bone and Bones / drug effects
  • Bone and Bones / metabolism*
  • Drug Monitoring / methods*
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Middle Aged
  • Osteoporosis, Postmenopausal* / diagnosis
  • Osteoporosis, Postmenopausal* / drug therapy
  • Osteoporosis, Postmenopausal* / metabolism

Substances

  • Biomarkers
  • Bone Density Conservation Agents