Label-free biosensors are often used in the discovery of therapeutic antibodies to characterize the epitope binding regions of a panel of monoclonal antibodies that target a specific antigen, thus facilitating their organization into epitope groups or "bins". When tested in a pairwise combinatorial manner, two antibodies that compete with one another for binding to a specific antigen may be grouped into the same epitope bin - that is, they recognize similar or overlapping epitopes - whereas two antibodies that bind simultaneously to the antigen are placed into different epitope bins. However, depending on the assay format used, results from such experiments can sometimes contradict one another. Here, we provide two examples that illustrate how antigen heterogeneity, either inherent in an antigen sample, or induced by the assay conditions, can confound the interpretation of epitope binning results and, in some cases, lead to erroneous conclusions. We highlight why assays that employ solution antigen are often more reliable than those that employ immobilized antigen and, by corroborating our binning results with assays that utilize native antigen, we determine which subpopulations of our heterogeneous antigen samples are biologically relevant and thus improve the correlation between epitope bins and functional activity. Furthermore, we provide recommendations for performing definitive binning assays and a diagnostic assay procedure that can be followed when antigen heterogeneity is suspected.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.