Childhood adversity and psychosis: examining whether the association is due to genetic confounding using a monozygotic twin differences approach

Eur Psychiatry. 2013 May;28(4):207-12. doi: 10.1016/j.eurpsy.2012.03.001. Epub 2012 Sep 1.

Abstract

Purpose: To test whether the association between childhood adversity and positive and negative psychotic experiences is due to genetic confounding.

Method: Childhood adversity and psychotic experiences were assessed in an ongoing sample of 226 twins from the general population. A monozygotic (MZ) twin differences approach was used to assess possible genetic confounding.

Results: In the whole sample, childhood adversity was significantly associated with positive (β=45; SE=0.16; P=0.008) and negative psychotic experiences (β=0.77; SE=0.18; P<0.01). Within-pair MZ twin differences in exposure to childhood adversity were significantly associated with differences in positive (β=71; SE=0.29; P=0.016) and negative psychotic experiences (β=98; SE=0.38; P=0.014) in a subsample of 85 MZ twin pairs.

Conclusions: Individuals exposed to childhood adversity are more likely to report psychotic experiences. Furthermore, our findings indicate that this association is not due to genetic confounding.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
  • Twin Study

MeSH terms

  • Adolescent
  • Adult Survivors of Child Abuse / psychology
  • Child
  • Child Abuse / psychology*
  • Diseases in Twins / genetics*
  • Diseases in Twins / psychology
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Middle Aged
  • Psychotic Disorders / genetics*
  • Psychotic Disorders / psychology
  • Risk Factors
  • Social Environment*
  • Twins, Monozygotic / genetics*
  • Twins, Monozygotic / psychology