Is it necessary to evaluate nuclei in HER2 FISH evaluation?

Am J Clin Pathol. 2013 Jan;139(1):47-54. doi: 10.1309/AJCPPXLYJVFGOV8I.

Abstract

A new method that simplifies the evaluation of the traditional HER2 fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) evaluation in breast cancer was proposed. HER2 status was evaluated in digital images (DIs) captured from 423 invasive breast cancer stained sections. All centromeric/CEP17 and HER2 gene signals obtained from separated stacked DIs were manually counted on the screen. The global ratios were compared with the traditional FISH evaluation and the immunohistochemical status. The 2 FISH scores were convergent in 96.93% of cases, showing an "almost perfect" agreement with a weighted k of 0.956 (95% confidence interval, 0.928-0.985). The new method evaluates at least 3 times more nuclei than traditional methods and also has an almost perfect agreement with the immunohistochemical scores. The proposed enhanced method substantially improves HER2 FISH assessment in breast cancer biopsy specimens because the evaluation of HER2/CEP17 copy numbers is more representative, easier, and faster than the conventional method.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study
  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Biopsy
  • Breast Neoplasms / diagnosis
  • Breast Neoplasms / genetics*
  • Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast / diagnosis
  • Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast / genetics*
  • Cell Nucleus / genetics*
  • Cell Nucleus / pathology
  • Centromere / genetics
  • Centromere / pathology
  • Chromosomes, Human, Pair 17
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Image Processing, Computer-Assisted
  • In Situ Hybridization, Fluorescence*
  • Observer Variation
  • Receptor, ErbB-2 / genetics*
  • Reproducibility of Results

Substances

  • ERBB2 protein, human
  • Receptor, ErbB-2