Objectives: We had for aim to check the appropriateness of our practices according to French guidelines (17th consensus conference, SPILF 2008) and to identify variables associated with the delay before appropriate measures were implemented.
Methods: Our retrospective observational study (2009-2011) focused on acute bacterial meningitis (ABM) in adults. Data was collected on a standardized questionnaire from medical charts and nurse reports.
Results: We included 31 adults presenting with ABM; 29 (93.5%) received ceftriaxone or cefotaxime in the emergency department. Indications for corticosteroids and brain imaging complied with guidelines in respectively 71.0% and 83.9% of cases. The median delays (IQR) were: admission/lumbar puncture (LP), 2h43 [1h09-5h57]; admission/antimicrobials, 3h21 [1h34-5h11]. The indication of suspected ABM in the admission letter was associated with earlier LP (P=0.01), and was almost significantly associated also with faster initiation of adequate antibiotic therapy (P=0.05).
Conclusions: Suspicion of ABM mentioned in the admission letter was associated to a better management in the emergency department.
Keywords: Bacterial meningitis; Méningite bactérienne; Professional practice assessment; Évaluation des pratiques professionnelles.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.