Background: Controversy exists amongst ENT surgeons as to the best way to manage a non-syndromal and otherwise healthy child with suspected OSAS. In 2002, The American Association of Paediatricians stated that the gold standard is a full polysomnography (PSG) for all children with suspected OSA and the revised version in 2012 repeated that requirement but recognized that facilities are not always available. In 2009 a UK Multidisciplinary Consensus Statement disagreed and reserved a full PSG for younger and syndromal or complicated children. We undertook a survey of UK ENT surgeons before and after the UK Consensus Statement to identify common practice with regards to diagnosis and management of suspected paediatric obstructive sleep apnoea syndrome in the UK.
Method: A questionnaire based on the management of a typical clinical case was sent to 542 ENT consultants in 2005 and repeated in 2011.
Results: Less than 2% used PSG in assessing the child presented in our case study in both surveys. About 70% of respondents indicated that they would proceed with management of the child with no form of sleep study at all and this clinical practice has not changed after UK Multidisciplinary Consensus Statement. The majority would treat a child with possible OSAS and no co-morbidities with adenotonsillectomy as an inpatient.
Discussion: The availability of paediatric PSG is very limited and because of a lack of normative data, uncertainty about interpretation of abnormal results, the recognition that even moderate snoring without sleep apnoea has detrimental neuro-cognitive effects and the fact that adenotonsillectomy is a very effective treatment for paediatric OSA we felt that a pragmatic and safe approach was to treat selected patients as if they had a positive PSG with appropriate anaesthetic technique and post operative care and monitoring.
Keywords: Data collection; Obstructive; Paediatric; Polysomnography; Sleep apnea.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.