Soil-borne bacterial structure and diversity does not reflect community activity in Pampa biome

PLoS One. 2013 Oct 16;8(10):e76465. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0076465. eCollection 2013.

Abstract

The Pampa biome is considered one of the main hotspots of the world's biodiversity and it is estimated that half of its original vegetation was removed and converted to agricultural land and tree plantations. Although an increasing amount of knowledge is being assembled regarding the response of soil bacterial communities to land use change, to the associated plant community and to soil properties, our understanding about how these interactions affect the microbial community from the Brazilian Pampa is still poor and incomplete. In this study, we hypothesized that the same soil type from the same geographic region but under distinct land use present dissimilar soil bacterial communities. To test this hypothesis, we assessed the soil bacterial communities from four land-uses within the same soil type by 454-pyrosequencing of 16S rRNA gene and by soil microbial activity analyzes. We found that the same soil type under different land uses harbor similar (but not equal) bacterial communities and the differences were controlled by many microbial taxa. No differences regarding diversity and richness between natural areas and areas under anthropogenic disturbance were detected. However, the measures of microbial activity did not converge with the 16S rRNA data supporting the idea that the coupling between functioning and composition of bacterial communities is not necessarily correlated.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Bacteria / growth & development*
  • Bacteria / metabolism
  • Base Sequence
  • Biomass
  • Brazil
  • Carbon Dioxide / metabolism
  • Ecosystem*
  • Principal Component Analysis
  • Soil / chemistry
  • Soil Microbiology*

Substances

  • Soil
  • Carbon Dioxide

Grants and funding

This work was supported by the Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq – grant numbers 479133/2012-3 and 476121/2010-8). RJS Jacques, ZI Antoniolli, FAO Camargo and LFW Roesch receive research fellowships from the CNPq. M Lupatini and AKA Suleiman receive research fellowships from the Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES - Brazil). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.