The strength of primary care in Europe: an international comparative study

Br J Gen Pract. 2013 Nov;63(616):e742-50. doi: 10.3399/bjgp13X674422.

Abstract

Background: A suitable definition of primary care to capture the variety of prevailing international organisation and service-delivery models is lacking.

Aim: Evaluation of strength of primary care in Europe.

Design and setting: International comparative cross-sectional study performed in 2009-2010, involving 27 EU member states, plus Iceland, Norway, Switzerland, and Turkey.

Method: Outcome measures covered three dimensions of primary care structure: primary care governance, economic conditions of primary care, and primary care workforce development; and four dimensions of primary care service-delivery process: accessibility, comprehensiveness, continuity, and coordination of primary care. The primary care dimensions were operationalised by a total of 77 indicators for which data were collected in 31 countries. Data sources included national and international literature, governmental publications, statistical databases, and experts' consultations.

Results: Countries with relatively strong primary care are Belgium, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, Lithuania, the Netherlands, Portugal, Slovenia, Spain, and the UK. Countries either have many primary care policies and regulations in place, combined with good financial coverage and resources, and adequate primary care workforce conditions, or have consistently only few of these primary care structures in place. There is no correlation between the access, continuity, coordination, and comprehensiveness of primary care of countries.

Conclusion: Variation is shown in the strength of primary care across Europe, indicating a discrepancy in the responsibility given to primary care in national and international policy initiatives and the needed investments in primary care to solve, for example, future shortages of workforce. Countries are consistent in their primary care focus on all important structure dimensions. Countries need to improve their primary care information infrastructure to facilitate primary care performance management.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study
  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Clinical Governance
  • Continuity of Patient Care / economics
  • Continuity of Patient Care / standards
  • Cost-Benefit Analysis
  • Cross-Sectional Studies
  • Delivery of Health Care / economics
  • Delivery of Health Care / standards
  • Europe
  • Health Personnel
  • Health Services Accessibility / economics
  • Health Services Accessibility / standards
  • Humans
  • Primary Health Care / economics
  • Primary Health Care / standards*
  • Referral and Consultation / economics
  • Referral and Consultation / standards
  • Staff Development