Bone tissue modelling and remodelling following guided bone regeneration in combination with biphasic calcium phosphate materials presenting different microporosity

Clin Oral Implants Res. 2015 Jul;26(7):814-22. doi: 10.1111/clr.12361. Epub 2014 Mar 5.

Abstract

Objectives: The aim of this study was to investigate bone regeneration following application of a novel biphasic calcium phosphate (BCP I) composed of microstructured granules of 90% β-tricalcium phosphate (β-TCP)/10% hydroxyapatite (HA) compared to BCP non-microstructured biphasic calcium phosphate with a composite of 60% hydroxyapatite/40% β-TCP (BCP II) and a deproteinized bovine bone mineral (DBBM) at surgically created defects in the mandible of minipigs in a combined approach with guided bone regeneration (GBR).

Material and methods: Sixteen minipigs were used for the study. Lower premolars P2, P3, P4 and first molar M1 were extracted. Following 3 months of healing, two defects with a width and depth of 7 mm were created bilaterally in the mandible. The different grafting materials were randomly placed in the created defects and covered by means of a collagen membrane. After 3 and 8 weeks, biopsies were sampled. All specimens were evaluated with descriptive histology and histomorphometric evaluations complemented by micro-CT scan analysis.

Results: All three biomaterials presented with higher bone volume at 8 weeks compared to 3 weeks (P < 0.0442). BCP I and DBBM demonstrated a significant higher amount of bone formation compared to BCP II at 8 weeks (P < 0.0328). BCP I also demonstrated a significant higher percentage of remaining graft volume compared to the other test groups both at 3 and 8 weeks (P < 0.0001 to P < 0.0003). Congruently, defects containing BCP I showed a significant higher amount of mineralized tissue compared to the other groups.

Conclusions: All the three test materials performed well with regard to bone formation at 8 weeks. BCP I showed significant higher amounts of newly formed bone despite a higher remaining graft volume compared to the other groups. With regard to the regenerative outcome, all the three materials can be recommended for clinical use.

Keywords: GBR; alveolar socket; bone substitute; graft; guided bone regeneration; membranes.

MeSH terms

  • Animals
  • Bone Regeneration / physiology*
  • Bone Remodeling / physiology*
  • Bone Substitutes / pharmacology*
  • Collagen / pharmacology
  • Hydroxyapatites / pharmacology*
  • Mandible / diagnostic imaging
  • Mandible / surgery*
  • Minerals / pharmacology
  • Particle Size
  • Porosity
  • Surgical Flaps
  • Swine
  • Swine, Miniature
  • Tooth Extraction
  • X-Ray Microtomography

Substances

  • Bio-Gide
  • Bio-Oss
  • Bone Substitutes
  • Hydroxyapatites
  • Minerals
  • hydroxyapatite-beta tricalcium phosphate
  • Collagen