Natural and unnatural history of patients with severe carotid sinus hypersensitivity: a preliminary study

Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 1988 Nov;11(11 Pt 2):1628-35. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.1988.tb06286.x.

Abstract

Natural history of patients with symptomatic severe carotid sinus hypersensitivity is not clearly known. In order to evaluate the effectiveness of pacing therapy in these patients we performed a randomized treatment/no-treatment prospective study in 35 patients. They were randomly assigned to two groups: 19 patients received no therapy, 16 patients received a VVI (#11) or DDD (#5) pacemaker implant. During the 8.4 +/- 4.3 month follow-up period patients receiving no therapy had recurrence of syncope in 9 cases (47%) and minor symptoms in 13 (68%); at the 16th month, actuarial curve showed absence of syncope in 36% of patients and of any symptoms in 30%. During the 7.2 +/- 4.1 month follow-up period, the patients receiving the pacemaker implant had no recurrence of syncope, minor symptoms in three (19%); at the 16th month, actuarial curve showed absence of syncope in 100% of patients and of any symptoms in 78%. During follow-up, 12 patients in no-treatment group received a pacemaker implant because of the recurrence of severe symptoms; successively they had a strong reduction of symptoms. In conclusion, this study definitively demonstrates that patients with severe symptomatic carotid sinus hypersensitivity had a high rate of recurrence of spontaneous symptoms and that in these patients cardiac pacing is a useful therapy.

Publication types

  • Clinical Trial
  • Comparative Study
  • Randomized Controlled Trial

MeSH terms

  • Aged
  • Carotid Sinus / physiopathology*
  • Female
  • Follow-Up Studies
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Pacemaker, Artificial*
  • Prospective Studies
  • Random Allocation
  • Recurrence
  • Reflex, Abnormal / complications*
  • Reflex, Abnormal / therapy
  • Syncope / etiology*
  • Syncope / therapy
  • Syndrome