Impact of BMI on postoperative outcomes in patients undergoing proctectomy for rectal cancer: a national surgical quality improvement program analysis

Dis Colon Rectum. 2014 Jun;57(6):687-93. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000000097.

Abstract

Background: There is a mounting body of evidence that suggests worsened postoperative outcomes at the extremes of BMI, yet few studies investigate this relationship in patients undergoing proctectomy for rectal cancer.

Objective: We aimed to examine the relationship between BMI and short-term outcomes after proctectomy for cancer.

Design: This was a retrospective study comparing the outcomes of patients undergoing proctectomy for rectal cancer as they relate to BMI.

Settings: The American College of Surgeons-National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database was queried for this study.

Patients: Patients included were those who underwent proctectomy for rectal neoplasm between 2005 and 2011.

Main outcome measures: Study end points included 30-day mortality and overall morbidity, including the receipt of blood transfusion, venous thromboembolic disease, wound dehiscence, renal failure, reintubation, cardiac complications, readmission, reoperation, and infectious complications (surgical site infection, intra-abdominal abscess, pneumonia, and urinary tract infection). Univariate logistic regression was used to analyze differences among patients of varying BMI ranges (kg/m; ≤20, 20-24, 25-29, 30-34, and ≥35). When significant differences were found, multivariable logistic regression, adjusting for preoperative demographic and clinical variables, was performed.

Results: A total of 11,995 patients were analyzed in this study. The incidences of overall morbidity, wound infection, urinary tract infection, venous thromboembolic event, and sepsis were highest in those patients with a BMI of ≥35 kg/m (OR, 1.63, 3.42, 1.47, 1.64, and 1.50). Wound dehiscence was also significantly more common in heavier patients. Patients with a BMI <20 kg/m had significantly increased rates of mortality (OR, 1.72) and sepsis (OR, 1.30).

Limitations: This study was limited by its retrospective design. Furthermore, it only includes patients from the American College of Surgeons-National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database, limiting its generalizability to nonparticipating hospitals.

Conclusions: Obese and underweight patients undergoing proctectomy for neoplasm are at a higher risk for postoperative complications and death.

MeSH terms

  • Aged
  • Aged, 80 and over
  • Body Mass Index*
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Incidence
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Outcome Assessment, Health Care*
  • Postoperative Complications / epidemiology*
  • Quality Improvement
  • Rectal Neoplasms / mortality
  • Rectal Neoplasms / surgery*
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Sepsis / epidemiology*
  • Surgical Wound Dehiscence / epidemiology
  • Surgical Wound Infection / epidemiology
  • Urinary Tract Infections / epidemiology*
  • Venous Thromboembolism / epidemiology*