Measuring the meaning of miscarriage: revision of the Impact of Miscarriage Scale

J Nurs Meas. 2014;22(1):29-45. doi: 10.1891/1061-3749.22.1.29.

Abstract

Background and purpose: The purpose of this study was to determine a factor structure for the Impact of Miscarriage Scale (IMS). The 24 items comprising the IMS were originally derived from a phenomenological study of miscarriage in women. Initial psychometric properties were established based on a sample of 188 women (Swanson, 1999a).

Method: Data from 341 couples were subjected to confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) and exploratory factor analysis (EFA).

Results: CFA did not confirm the original structure. EFA explained 57% of the variance through an 18-item, 4-factor structure: isolation and guilt, loss of baby, devastating event, and adjustment. Except for the Adjustment subscale, Cronbach's alpha coefficients were > or = .78.

Conclusion: Although a 3-factor solution is most defensible, with further refinement and additional items, the 4th factor (adjustment) may warrant retention.

Publication types

  • Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural

MeSH terms

  • Abortion, Spontaneous / nursing
  • Abortion, Spontaneous / psychology*
  • Adolescent
  • Adult
  • Factor Analysis, Statistical
  • Female
  • Humans
  • Male
  • Middle Aged
  • Nursing Assessment / methods*
  • Parents / psychology*
  • Pregnancy
  • Psychometrics
  • Surveys and Questionnaires