Pros and cons of ion-torrent next generation sequencing versus terminal restriction fragment length polymorphism T-RFLP for studying the rumen bacterial community

PLoS One. 2014 Jul 22;9(7):e101435. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0101435. eCollection 2014.

Abstract

The development of next generation sequencing has challenged the use of other molecular fingerprinting methods used to study microbial diversity. We analysed the bacterial diversity in the rumen of defaunated sheep following the introduction of different protozoal populations, using both next generation sequencing (NGS: Ion Torrent PGM) and terminal restriction fragment length polymorphism (T-RFLP). Although absolute number differed, there was a high correlation between NGS and T-RFLP in terms of richness and diversity with R values of 0.836 and 0.781 for richness and Shannon-Wiener index, respectively. Dendrograms for both datasets were also highly correlated (Mantel test = 0.742). Eighteen OTUs and ten genera were significantly impacted by the addition of rumen protozoa, with an increase in the relative abundance of Prevotella, Bacteroides and Ruminobacter, related to an increase in free ammonia levels in the rumen. Our findings suggest that classic fingerprinting methods are still valuable tools to study microbial diversity and structure in complex environments but that NGS techniques now provide cost effect alternatives that provide a far greater level of information on the individual members of the microbial population.

Publication types

  • Comparative Study
  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Animals
  • Base Sequence
  • Ciliophora / physiology
  • DNA, Bacterial / genetics
  • Fermentation
  • High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing
  • Microbiota / genetics*
  • Polymorphism, Restriction Fragment Length
  • Rumen / microbiology*
  • Sequence Analysis, DNA
  • Sheep, Domestic / microbiology

Substances

  • DNA, Bacterial

Grants and funding

This work was supported by the Commission of the European Communities (Rednex project FP7-KBBE-2007-1) and the Welsh Government. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.