Survival outcomes in elderly patients with glioblastoma

D S Tsang; L Khan; J R Perry; H Soliman; A Sahgal; J L Keith; T G Mainprize; S Das; L Zhang; M N Tsao

doi:10.1016/j.clon.2014.11.026

Survival outcomes in elderly patients with glioblastoma

Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol). 2015 Mar;27(3):176-83. doi: 10.1016/j.clon.2014.11.026. Epub 2014 Dec 27.

Authors

D S Tsang¹, L Khan¹, J R Perry², H Soliman¹, A Sahgal¹, J L Keith³, T G Mainprize⁴, S Das⁵, L Zhang⁶, M N Tsao⁷

Affiliations

¹ Department of Radiation Oncology, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
² Division of Neurology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
³ Department of Anatomic Pathology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
⁴ Division of Neurosurgery, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
⁵ Division of Neurosurgery, St. Michael's Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
⁶ MacroStat. Inc., Toronto, Canada.
⁷ Department of Radiation Oncology, Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada. Electronic address: may.tsao@sunnybrook.ca.

PMID: 25549930
DOI: 10.1016/j.clon.2014.11.026

Abstract

Aims: Many elderly glioblastoma patients are excluded from randomised trials due to age, comorbidity or poor functional status. The purpose of this study was to describe the survival outcomes in all elderly patients with glioblastoma managed at a tertiary cancer centre.

Materials and methods: A retrospective chart review identified 235 elderly patients (age 65 years or over) with a histological diagnosis of glioblastoma between 1 December 2006 and 31 December 2013. The primary outcome of this study was overall survival by treatment type. Univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazard models were used to explore significant prognostic variables associated with overall survival.

Results: The median survival for all patients was 6.5 months (95% confidence interval 5.3-7.7), with 1 year overall survival of 23.7% (95% confidence interval 18.8-30.0). The median survival for patients treated with radiation and chemotherapy was 11.1 months (95% confidence interval 8.1-13.7). Patients treated with radiation alone had a median survival of 6.8 months (95% confidence interval 5.6-7.9). For patients managed with comfort measures only, the median survival was 1.9 months (95% confidence interval 1.6-2.6). Univariate analysis revealed age, performance status, surgery type (biopsy, subtotal resection, gross total resection) and type of treatment received (comfort measures only, radiotherapy alone, radiotherapy and chemotherapy) to be statistically associated with overall survival. In the multivariate analysis, only two predictive factors (treatment received and surgery type) were significant.

Conclusions: Elderly patients with glioblastoma selected for treatment (surgery followed by radiation alone or radiation and chemotherapy) survive longer than patients managed with comfort measures. Prospective randomised trials will help guide management for patients eligible for therapy. Elderly patients with glioblastoma who are deemed not eligible for active therapy have very short survival.

Keywords: Elderly; glioblastoma; survival.

Publication types

Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

Age Factors
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Brain Neoplasms / drug therapy
Brain Neoplasms / mortality*
Brain Neoplasms / radiotherapy
Female
France / epidemiology
Glioblastoma / drug therapy
Glioblastoma / mortality*
Glioblastoma / radiotherapy
Humans
Male
Retrospective Studies
Survival Analysis
Treatment Outcome