A controlled clinical study of amalgam restorations: survival, failures, and causes of failure

Dent Mater. 1989 Mar;5(2):115-21. doi: 10.1016/0109-5641(89)90141-3.

Abstract

The survival and modes of failure of amalgam restorations were investigated retrospectively. 2660 Class I or II lesions were restored and evaluated yearly or half-yearly for failures during the 30- to 84-month follow-up. Restorations with unacceptable margins were not counted as failures if no traces of secondary caries could be seen. 8% of the restorations were lost because of patient drop-out. Of the remaining restorations, 1% was replaced due to primary caries. Of the remaining number (2431), 9% failed because of all other reasons. The leading mode of failure was bulk fracture (4.6%), followed by tooth fracture (1.9%), and marginal ridge fracture (1.3%). For all other reasons, 0.8% of the restorations failed. Only two restorations were replaced because of secondary caries. The alloy selection in both conventional and high-copper categories significantly influenced the survival of the restorations for reasons directly related to the restoration.

MeSH terms

  • Dental Amalgam*
  • Dental Restoration, Permanent / statistics & numerical data*
  • Evaluation Studies as Topic
  • Follow-Up Studies
  • Humans

Substances

  • Dental Amalgam