Guesstimation of posterior malleolar fractures on lateral plain radiographs

Injury. 2015 Oct;46(10):2024-9. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2015.07.019. Epub 2015 Jul 26.

Abstract

Background: Accurate assessment of articular involvement of the posterior malleolar fracture fragments in ankle fractures is essential, as this is the leading argument for internal fixation. The purpose of this study is to assess diagnostic accuracy of measurements on plain lateral radiographs.

Methods: Quantification of three-dimensional computed tomography (Q-3D-CT) was used as a reference standard for true articular involvement (mm(2)) of posterior malleolar fractures. One-hundred Orthopaedic Trauma surgeons were willing to review 31 trimalleolar ankle fractures to estimate size of posterior malleolus and answer: (1) what is the involved articular surface of the posterior malleolar fracture as a percentage of the tibial plafond? and (2) would you fix the posterior malleolus?

Results: The average posterior malleolar fragment involved 13.5% (SD 10.8) of the tibial plafond articular surface, as quantified using Q-3D-CT. The average involvement of articular surface of the posterior malleolar fragment, as estimated by 100 observers on plain radiographs was 24.4% (SD 10.0). The factor 1.8 overestimation of articular involvement was statistically significant (p<0.001). Diagnostic accuracy of measurements on plain lateral radiographs was 22%. Interobserver agreement (ICC) was 0.61. Agreement on operative fixation, showed an ICC of 0.54 (Haraguchi type I=0.76, Haraguchi type II=0.40, Haraguchi type III=0.25).

Conclusions: Diagnostic accuracy of measurements on plain lateral radiographs to assess articular involvement of posterior malleolar fractures is poor. There is a tendency to misjudge posteromedial involvement (Haraguchi type II).

Keywords: Ankle; Posterior malleolar fragment; Q3DCT; Trauma; X-ray.

Publication types

  • Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

MeSH terms

  • Ankle Fractures / diagnostic imaging*
  • Ankle Fractures / pathology
  • Humans
  • Imaging, Three-Dimensional*
  • Netherlands
  • Observer Variation
  • Reference Standards
  • Reproducibility of Results
  • Sensitivity and Specificity
  • Tarsal Bones / diagnostic imaging*
  • Tarsal Bones / injuries
  • Tibia / diagnostic imaging*
  • Tibia / injuries
  • Tomography, X-Ray Computed* / instrumentation