Background: Caesarean section (CS) is a significant risk factor for venous thromboembolism; however, the optimal method of thromboprophylaxis around the time of CS is unknown.
Aims: To examine current thromboprophylaxis practice during and following CS in Australia and New Zealand, and the willingness of obstetricians to participate in a randomised controlled trial (RCT) comparing different methods of thromboprophylaxis after CS.
Materials and methods: An online survey was sent to fellows and trainees of the Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists.
Results: There were 488 responses from currently practising obstetricians (response rate 23.4%). During CS, 48% and 80% of obstetricians recommended intermittent pneumatic compression (IPC) and elastic stockings (ES), respectively. Following CS, 96-97% of obstetricians recommended early ambulation, 87-90% recommended ES, 23-36% recommended IPC, and 42-65% recommended low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) depending on clinical factors. Increased BMI (OR 3.42; 95% CI 2.87-4.06), emergency CS (OR 1.88; 95% CI 1.67-2.16) and older maternal age (OR 1.37; 95% CI 1.26-1.49) were associated with more frequent LMWH use. Of obstetricians who prescribed LMWH, 70% adjusted the dose depending on maternal weight. LMWH therapy was most commonly recommended until discharge from hospital (31%), <5 days (24%) and 5-7 days (15%). Most obstetricians (58-79%) were willing to enrol women in a RCT, but less likely if the woman had an increased BMI or emergency CS.
Conclusions: There is considerable variation in clinical practice regarding thromboprophylaxis during and following CS. Obstetricians support a RCT to assess different methods of thromboprophylaxis following CS.
Keywords: Caesarean section; clinical practice variation; prophylaxis; thromboembolism.
© 2015 The Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists.