Interval colorectal carcinoma: An unsolved debate

World J Gastroenterol. 2015 Dec 7;21(45):12735-41. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v21.i45.12735.

Abstract

Colorectal carcinoma (CRC), as the third most common new cancer diagnosis, poses a significant health risk to the population. Interval CRCs are those that appear after a negative screening test or examination. The development of interval CRCs has been shown to be multifactorial: location of exam-academic institution versus community hospital, experience of the endoscopist, quality of the procedure, age of the patient, flat versus polypoid neoplasia, genetics, hereditary gastrointestinal neoplasia, and most significantly missed or incompletely excised lesions. The rate of interval CRCs has decreased in the last decade, which has been ascribed to an increased understanding of interval disease and technological advances in the screening of high risk individuals. In this article, we aim to review the literature with regard to the multifactorial nature of interval CRCs and provide the most recent developments regarding this important gastrointestinal entity.

Keywords: Colorectal carcinoma; Detection; Interval colorectal carcinoma; Post colonoscopy colorectal cancer; Screening.

Publication types

  • Editorial
  • Review

MeSH terms

  • Adenomatous Polyps* / diagnosis
  • Adenomatous Polyps* / epidemiology
  • Adenomatous Polyps* / therapy
  • Carcinoma* / diagnosis
  • Carcinoma* / epidemiology
  • Carcinoma* / therapy
  • Colonic Polyps* / diagnosis
  • Colonic Polyps* / epidemiology
  • Colonic Polyps* / therapy
  • Colorectal Neoplasms* / diagnosis
  • Colorectal Neoplasms* / epidemiology
  • Colorectal Neoplasms* / therapy
  • Humans
  • Incidence
  • Predictive Value of Tests
  • Prognosis
  • Risk Assessment
  • Risk Factors