Objective: To describe cortical and trabecular volumetric bone mineral density (vBMD), bone mineral content (BMC), cross-sectional area (CSA), and bone strength indexes (BSIs) in adolescent endurance-trained cyclists (CYC) and compare them with controls (CON).
Design: Descriptive cohort study.
Participants: Twenty-five male adolescent CYC and 17 CON.
Assessment of risk factors: Peripheral quantitative computed tomography was used to evaluate proximal and distal sites of the radius and tibia.
Main outcome measures: Total, trabecular, and cortical BMC, vBMD, and CSA were measured. Also, cortical thickness, endosteal and periosteal circumferences, and different BSIs were calculated. Unadjusted analysis of variance and body weight-adjusted analysis of covariance tests were applied between cyclist and control groups.
Results: Cyclists were almost 12% lighter than CON (P < 0.05). Unadjusted data showed lower distal total vBMD and proximal cortical BMC and vBMD in cyclists compared with CON at the radius (P < 0.05) and lower distal total and trabecular BMC, vBMD and bone area, proximal total and cortical BMC and vBMD, and cortical bone area at the tibia (P < 0.05). Body weight-adjusted data showed the same differences for distal total vBMD at the radius and total and trabecular BMC and vBMD at the tibia, diaphyseal radius cortical vBMD and tibia total vBMD, cortical BMC and area, and also for tibia cortical thickness and BSI. The rest of differences were no longer detectable and bone area at the distal radius become significantly higher in cyclist compared with CON (P < 0.05).
Conclusions: Adolescent CYC in this study showed lower values of BMC and vBMD at determined sites of the radius and tibia than CON, some of these differences were explained in part by their lower body weight. However, even further adjustment, some differences remained, which indicates that further longitudinal studies are needed to better understand if cycling influences these differences.