Accuracy of secondary maxillofacial reconstruction with prefabricated fibula grafts using 3D planning and guided reconstruction

J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2016 Apr;44(4):392-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jcms.2015.12.008. Epub 2016 Jan 6.

Abstract

Background: We compared the pre-operative 3D-surgical plan with the surgical outcome of complex two-stage secondary reconstruction of maxillofacial defects using inserted implants in the prefabricated fibula graft.

Methods: Eleven reconstructions of maxillofacial defects with prefabricated fibulas were performed using a 3D virtual planning. Accuracy of placement of the fibula grafts and dental implants was compared to pre-operative 3D virtual plans by superimposing pre-operative and post-operative CT-scans: we first superimposed the CT-scans on the antagonist jaw, to represent the outcome of occlusion, and then superimposed on the planned fibula segments.

Results: Superimposing the CT scans on the antagonist jaws revealed a median deviation of the fibula segments and implants of 4.7 mm (IQR:3-6.5 mm) and 5.5 mm (IQR:2.8-7 mm) from the planned position, respectively. Superimposing of the CT scans on the fibula segments revealed a median difference of fibula and implant placement of 0.3 mm (IQR:0-1.6 mm) and 2.2 mm (IQR:1.5-2.9 mm), respectively.

Conclusions: The final position of the fibula graft is determined by the occlusion of the denture, which is designed from the 3D plan. From a prosthodontic perspective, the accuracy of 3D-surgical planning of reconstruction of maxillofacial defects with a fibula graft and the implants allows for a favorable functional position of the implants and fibula graft.

Keywords: 3D; Fibula; Implants; Mandible; Maxilla; Reconstruction.

MeSH terms

  • Bone Transplantation
  • Dental Implants
  • Fibula / surgery*
  • Fibula / transplantation
  • Humans
  • Imaging, Three-Dimensional*
  • Orthognathic Surgical Procedures*
  • Patient Care Planning*
  • Plastic Surgery Procedures / methods*
  • Treatment Outcome

Substances

  • Dental Implants