Use of Pediatric Open, Laparoscopic and Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Ureteral Reimplantation in the United States: 2000 to 2012

J Urol. 2016 Jul;196(1):207-12. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2016.02.065. Epub 2016 Feb 13.

Abstract

Purpose: We characterize the use of pediatric open, laparoscopic and robot-assisted laparoscopic ureteral reimplantation in the United States from 2000 to 2012.

Materials and methods: We used the Kids' Inpatient Database to identify patients who underwent ureteral reimplantation for primary vesicoureteral reflux. Before 2009 laparoscopic ureteral reimplantion and robot-assisted laparoscopic ureteral reimplantation were referred to together as minimally invasive ureteral reimplantation. A detailed analysis of open vs robot-assisted laparoscopic ureteral reimplantation was performed for 2009 and 2012.

Results: A total of 14,581 ureteral reimplantations were performed. The number of ureteral reimplantations yearly decreased by 14.3%. However, the proportion of minimally invasive ureteral reimplantations increased from 0.3% to 6.3%. A total of 125 robot-assisted laparoscopic ureteral reimplantations were performed in 2012 (81.2% of minimally invasive ureteral reimplantations), representing 5.1% of all ureteral reimplantations, compared to 3.8% in 2009. In 2009 and 2012 mean ± SD patient age was 5.7 ± 3.6 years for robot-assisted laparoscopic ureteral reimplantation and 4.3 ± 3.3 years for open reimplantation (p <0.0001). Mean ± SD length of hospitalization was 1.6 ± 1.3 days for robot-assisted laparoscopic ureteral reimplantation and 2.4 ± 2.6 for open reimplantation (p <0.0001). Median charges were $22,703 for open and $32,409 for robot-assisted laparoscopic ureteral reimplantation (p <0.0001). These relationships maintained significance on multivariate analyses. On multivariate analysis robot-assisted laparoscopic ureteral reimplantation use was associated with public insurance status (p = 0.04) and geographic region outside of the southern United States (p = 0.02). Only 50 of 456 hospitals used both approaches (open and robotic), and only 6 hospitals reported 5 or more robot-assisted laparoscopic ureteral reimplantations during 2012.

Conclusions: Treatment of primary vesicoureteral reflux with ureteral reimplantation is decreasing. Robot-assisted laparoscopic ureteral reimplantation is becoming more prevalent but remains relatively uncommon. Length of stay is shorter for the robotic approach but the costs are higher. Nationally robot-assisted laparoscopic ureteral reimplantation appears to still be in the early phase of adoption and is clustered at a small number of hospitals.

Keywords: pediatrics; replantation; robotics; urologic surgical procedures; vesico-ureteral reflux.

MeSH terms

  • Adolescent
  • Child
  • Child, Preschool
  • Databases, Factual
  • Health Care Costs / statistics & numerical data
  • Humans
  • Infant
  • Laparoscopy / economics
  • Laparoscopy / statistics & numerical data*
  • Laparoscopy / trends
  • Length of Stay / statistics & numerical data
  • Multivariate Analysis
  • Practice Patterns, Physicians' / economics
  • Practice Patterns, Physicians' / trends*
  • Replantation / economics
  • Replantation / methods*
  • Replantation / trends
  • Retrospective Studies
  • Robotic Surgical Procedures / economics
  • Robotic Surgical Procedures / statistics & numerical data*
  • Robotic Surgical Procedures / trends
  • United States
  • Ureter / surgery*
  • Urologic Surgical Procedures / economics
  • Urologic Surgical Procedures / methods*
  • Urologic Surgical Procedures / trends
  • Vesico-Ureteral Reflux / economics
  • Vesico-Ureteral Reflux / surgery*